Geometry.Net - Basic_B: Bureaucracy Sociology


Home - Basic_B - Bureaucracy Sociology

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

21-40 of 77 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 20

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Bureaucracy Sociology: more books (100)

Bureaucracy (New Perspectives on the Past) by Eugene Kamenka, 1989-12

Bureaucracy (Aspects of modern sociology; social processes) by Dennis Warwick, 1974

Formal Organization (Issues and trends in sociology) by Richard H. Hall, 1972-11-30

Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies For Reinventing Government by David Osborne, Peter Plastrik, 1997-01-08

Bureaucracy (Concepts in Social Thought) by David Beetham, 1996-06

Sociology of public bureaucracies, 1965-1975 (Current sociology) by Peta Tancred, 1976

The sociology of bureaucracy by Lee Loevinger, 1968

Hidden masculinity: Max Webers historical sociology of bureaucracy by Anneke van Baalen, 1994

Natural resource bureaucracy and rural poverty: A study in the political sociology of natural resources (Monograph / University of Michigan, School of ... Natural Resources Sociology Research Lab) by Patrick C West, 1982

Indonesian Education: Teachers, Schools, and Central Bureaucracy (East Asia: History, Politics, Sociology and Culture) by Christopher Bjork, 2005-06-01

Introduction To Sociology: A Text With Readings by Daniel E Hebding, Leonard Glick, 1995-08-01

The Self-Defeating Organization: A Critique of Bureaucracy by Alexander J. Matejko, 1986-02-21

Bureaucracy: The Career of a Concept (Ideas and ideologies) by Eugene Kamenka, 1979-10

The Mandarins: The Circulation of Elites in China, 1600-1900 (Dissertations on Sociology) by Robert Mortimer Marsh, 1980-06

lists with details

Sociology 250 - Notes On Max Weber
sociology 250. October 14, 1999. Rationalization and bureaucracy. A.Rationalization. Rationalization as an ideal type and as an historical
http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/o14f99.htm

Extractions: Sociology 250 October 14, 1999 Rationalization and Bureaucracy A. Rationalization Rationalization as an ideal type and as an historical force appears in much of Weber's writings. He regards the development of rational forms to be one of the most important characteristics of the development of Western society and capitalism. Weber viewed traditional and charismatic forms as irrational, or at least non-rational. The latter may rely on religion, magic, or the supernatural as a way of explaining the social world and authority may also derive from these. These may have no systematic form of development, but may rely on personal insight, revelation, emotions and feelings, features that are non-rational in form. In contrast, rationality consists of a set of social actions governed by reason or reasoning, calculation, plus rational pursuit of one's interests. Rationality forms a large part of rational-legal authority and there are several characteristics that Weber considers as aspects of rationality (Ritzer, pp. 124-125). Actions in the economic sphere or in formal organizations such as universities have most of these characteristics and many of these can be taken as examples of rationality. Calculability . Results can be calculated or estimated by adopting assumptions and considering the methods by which results will be achieved. This is especially the case in formal institutions or in businesses Efficiency . Actors have various ends and attempt to find the best means to achieving these ends.
Bureaucracy And Race
Evans shows that apartheid was sustained by a great and everswelling bureaucracy. AUTHOR(back to top) Ivan Evans is Assistant Professor of sociology at the
http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/6881.html

Extractions: Free online edition (eScholarship) "Most writing on South Africascholarly and otherwisehas concentrated on showing what it meant for Africans to be caught in the web; Evans writes about what it meant to spin it."Frederick Cooper, editor of Tensions of Empire DESCRIPTION (back to top) Bureaucracy and Race overturns the common assumption that apartheid in South Africa was enforced only through terror and coercion. Without understating the role of violent intervention, Ivan Evans shows that apartheid was sustained by a great and ever-swelling bureaucracy. The Department of Native Affairs (DNA), which had dwindled during the last years of the segregation regime, unexpectedly revived and became the arrogant, authoritarian fortress of apartheid after 1948. The DNA was a major player in the prolonged exclusion of Africans from citizenship and the establishment of a racially repressive labor market. Exploring the connections between racial domination and bureaucratic growth in South Africa, Evans points out that the DNA's transformation of oppression into "civil administration" institutionalized and, for whites, legitimized a vast, coercive bureaucratic culture, which ensnared millions of Africans in its workings and corrupted the entire state. Evans focuses on certain features of apartheidthe pass system, the "racialization of space" in urban areas, and the cooptation of African chiefs in the Bantustansin order to make it clear that the state's relentless administration, not its overtly repressive institutions, was the most distinctive feature of South Africa in the 1950s.
Sociology - B
bubonic plague bureaucracy bureaucratic collectivism The Bureaucratic Society ofControlled Consumption bureaucratization. Same Level . sociology A sociology
http://www.webref.org/sociology/b.htm
Sociology
431 Political sociology (3 cr) Same as POLS 431 Topics include determinants of politicalbehavior, power, elite formation, bureaucracy, and the political role
http://sape.aucegypt.edu/sociology.htm
404 Not Found
sociology, bureaucracy by Dino Rodriguez Max Webers work on bureaucracy focuseson the formation of a large, structured, and impersonal organization that
http://www.gotessays.com/science/sociology/index.php
SOCIOLOGY 225 SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH CARE
health care concerns such as the contributions of sociology to health medical education;illness behaviors; health care and bureaucracy; transcultural studies
http://www.luc.edu/depts/sociology/mf225.html

Extractions: [Back to Courses] SOCIOLOGY 225 SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH CARE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY DR. MARCEL FREDERICKS Office: DH 934 Phone: 773-508-3467 Focus and Organization of this Course: This course provides students with an opportunity to analyze specific health care issues which impact society. Special emphasis is given to the integration of Society-Culture-Personality [the SCP model] and health care concerns such as the contributions of sociology to health care; the explosion of the health care institution; the sick role; family and health care; medical education; illness behaviors; health care and bureaucracy; transcultural studies impacting health care; human ecology and health care; mental illness; American with Disabilities Act; aging; and death and dying. Class sessions include seminars and lectures. Films and outside speakers will be used when pertinent. Points of clarification, relevant questions, interesting ideas, and student discussions are actively encouraged. Students are encouraged to use library and Internet resources. The theme of the course and the organization of the materials are both centered in the sociology of health care. Attendance is mandatory. Texts Anatomy of an Illness [paperback edition] - Dr. Norman Cousins
Sociology@Brown - So150 (Sem 1, '00-01)
315391. Selznick, Philip An Approach to a Theory of bureaucracy , AmericanSociological Review 8 (1943), pp. 47-54. (eds.), sociology Today.
http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Sociology/classes/sem1_00-01/so150.html

Extractions: Course Outline and Reading List Modern society is to a large degree a bureaucratic society, i.e. many of its functional requirements such as allocation of means and social integration are carried out and controlled by complex organizations. But governmental bureaucracies are not the only important organizations from the viewpoint of the integration of society. The most powerful social units which make up modern society are bureaucracies. To the German sociologist Max Weber, the distinguishing characteristic of modern capitalism is the "rational organization of free labor". Big business and (not so big) labor just as political parties and school systems make up a good part of the societal web. The still growing utilization of complex organization also means that in order to effectively exercise our rights of dissent and representation we must employ bureaucracies. We shall examine the bureaucratic phenomenon at the core of organizations which characterize our present world, and as it is found in the realities of modern social life. The social sience to be learned in this course is one which is guided by problems of life and practice rather than by intellectually self-generated conceptions and techniques. The strength of sociology is identifying issues . In addition, not only the devil but also sociology is in the details of
Sociology@Brown - So103 (Sem 1, '00-01)
Weber, Max (1946 trans.), bureaucracy, in Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills (Eds.),From Max Weber Essays in sociology, New York Oxford University Press
http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Sociology/classes/sem1_00-01/so103.html

Extractions: We live our lives in an organizational environment. Most of us are born in hospitals, educated in schools, employed by companies, provided with services by our local and federal governments, pay taxes to those governments, and end our days in the hands of a church or a funeral home. Our dependence on organizations is one of the signal features of modernity. In this course, we will analyze how organizations have become so prolific and so powerful. Themes of the class will include: How organizations evolved historically from the church and the military How organizations relate to and affect one another The variety of ways in which organizations can be structured internally, and how this affects their outputs
Auster: Sociology Of Work
The sociology of work is not just about workers; it is about the The concepts of bureaucracy,informal organizational structure, and the system of professions
http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/3/monahan.html

Extractions: xxiv + 456 pp. Order this book Sociology's subfield of work and occupations covers a lot of ground. Work can be understood in multiple contexts: cultural, economic, organizational, and occupational. The immediate relevance of work to a student, however, is more personal: what will the world of work be like for me? Carol Auster's The Sociology of Work: Concepts and Cases addresses the student's pressing question; it is a textbook that is less about work as a social phenomenon and more about workers' experiences. As such, it is most accurately described as a textbook on the sociology of workers. And, with this more micro-level approach, it is markedly less structural in its emphasis than texts on the sociology of work authored by Hall (1994) and Auster organizes the material in terms of how workers experience their jobs: what factors influence occupational choice, how workers are socialized to the norms of the workplace, how workers feel about their jobs, ways in which workers bend the rules on the job, how workers deal with the dual demands of work and family, and how technological changes in the workplace affect workers. Each chapter concludes with multiple case studies that illustrate the concepts introduced in the text. The case studies are very engaging and range from the predictable pieces on doctors and lawyers to less conventional choices on such occupations as fences (that is, middlemen for stolen merchandise), basketball coaches, and garbage collectors. Auster's extensive use of case studies is valuable in that it makes the abstract material in the text more relevant to students and introduces them to kinds of work with which they are probably unfamiliar.
Bureaucracy
Jaques, Described an ideal type of hierarchical organization. See PenguinDictionary of sociology, under bureaucracy. Pitfalls of bureaucracy.
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~rxv/orgmgt/bureaucracy.htm

Extractions: veryard projects business organization management > bureaucracy we offer definition on this page links consultancy management briefings and technical education independent advice on tools and methods Bureaucracy refers to a particular form and style of administrative organization. Although it has been subject to strong criticism for a long time, bureaucracy and its variants can still be found in a large number of organizations. views pitfalls alternatives misconceptions ... contact us veryard projects business organization management bureaucracy > views Weber Described an ideal type of bureaucractic organization, which he equated with administrative rationality. Merton Bureaucracy becomes inflexible because of various unanticipated consequences that derive from its structure. Crozier Bureaucracies embody vicious circles of decreasing efficiency and effectiveness. Jaques Described an ideal type of hierarchical organization. See Penguin Dictionary of Sociology , under Bureaucracy veryard projects business organization management bureaucracy > pitfalls There is a tendency in some bureaucratic organizations to regard small disasters as equally bad as large disasters, if not worse (because a large disaster is regarded as Act of God, whereas a small disaster is the fault of an individual). Therefore trivial risks must be avoided at all costs, even if it means incurring huge risks.
SAGE Publications - Table Of Contents - The Sociology Of Organizations
The sociology of Organizations Classic, Contemporary, and Critical Readings Editedby as Rational Systems I Classic Theories of bureaucracy and Administration,
http://www.sagepub.com/booktoc.aspx?pid=8889&sc=1
SAGE Publications - The Sociology Of Organizations
all the material expected in a onesemester sociology of organizations Organizationsas Rational Systems I Classic Theories of bureaucracy and Administration,
http://www.sagepub.com/printerfriendly.aspx?pid=8889&ptype=B
Bureaucracy
bureaucracy. Click Here. All purchases support research and education. IversonSoftware Glossary / Dictionary of Terms Terminology of sociology.
http://www.iversonsoftware.com/sociology/bureaucracy.htm
Online Courses Handbook 2003
7947 (v.6) sociology 221 sociology of Organisation, bureaucracy and CorporationsArea School of Social Sciences. Contact Hours 3.0. Credits 25.0.
http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/handbook/units/79/7947.html

Extractions: Sociology of work organisations and industry. Interrelationships of work and leisure. Technological change and organisational response, changing work patterns, and unemployment and social dislocation. The social effects of the division of labour. Communication, conflict and control within organisations. The effects of education on work behaviour and work role allocation in capitalist and non capitalist societies.
Online Courses Handbook 2003
the State, 3.0, 25.0. 3484, v.7, sociology 321 sociology of Organisation,bureaucracy and Corporations, 3.0, 50.0. 3528, v.7, sociology
http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/handbook/courses/30/305931.html

Extractions: Undergraduate Sociology Units Available in the School of Social Sciences. Optional Units (No Year Level Specified) Hrs/Wk Credits v.7 Sociology 215 - Sociology of Deviance, Normality and Social Control v.7 Sociology 223 - Sociology of the Arts - Arts, Institutions and the State v.7 Sociology 321 - Sociology of Organisation, Bureaucracy and Corporations v.7 Sociology 322 - Sociology of Community and Environment v.7 Sociology 214 - Sociology of the Family - Challenges, Changes and the Family v.4 Sociology 111 - Social Construction of Identity - Introduction to Doing Sociology v.4 Sociology 112 - Australian Society in the Global Economy v.6 Sociology 211 - Social Change, Globalisation and Uneven Development v.6 Sociology 212 - Sociology of Asian Media, Culture and Society v.6 Sociology 221 - Sociology of Organisation, Bureaucracy and Corporations v.6
BUREAUCRACY AND GROWTH:
bureaucracy AND GROWTH A CrossNational Analysis. of the Effects of WeberianState Structures. on Economic Growth*. Peter Evans. Department of sociology.
http://sociology.berkeley.edu/faculty/evans/burperf.html

Extractions: BUREAUCRACY AND GROWTH: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of Weberian State Structures on Economic Growth* Peter Evans Department of Sociology University of California, Berkeley and James Rauch Department of Economics University of California, San Diego Word Count: 7,082 Please address all correspondence to Peter Evans, Department of Sociology, 410 Barrows Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA These results grow out of the project on Bureaucratic Structure and Economic Performance directed by Peter Evans and James Rauch and funded in various stages by the Russell Sage Foundation, the Center for Institutional Reform, and the Informal Sector and Policy Research Department of the World Bank. We would also like to thank the 126 country experts for their generosity in sharing their knowledge and professional expertise. The findings reported here were produced by Linus Huang and John Talbot, working under the direction of Peter Evans and James Rauch. Patrick Heller and Mark Ritchie provided invaluable assistance in earlier stages of the data analysis. For comments on earlier drafts we are grateful to Ken Bollen, Neil Fligstein, Trond Petersen, Erik Olin Wright. Christy Getz played an invaluable role in the revision of the manuscript .
101b_syllabus
DURKHEIM (18581917). January 20 Roots of Durkheim. sociology as Science. Whatis bureaucracy? bureaucracy*, Sections 1 and 2, (pp.196-204).
http://sociology.berkeley.edu/faculty/burawoy/101b_syllabus.html

Extractions: HISTORY OF SOCIAL THEORY This is the second semester of our two semester course devoted to the history of social theory. Last semester we studied the development of Marxism beginning with the writings of Marx and Engels followed by Lenin, Gramsci and Fanon. This semester we will study various critical responses to Marxism, beginning with Durkheim and Weber, and then moving on to contemporary theorists, namely Foucault, De Beauvoir, and MacKinnon. Although the critique of Marx and Marxism has loomed large in sociological theory, we can also construct a dialogue among Durkheim, Weber, Foucault and feminism. Thus, we will see how Weber can be viewed as a response to Durkheim, how Foucault combines and moves beyond both of these and how feminism, assimilates, rejects and moves beyond the entire sociological canon. As last semester, we will study our theorists through the lens of the division of labor and the inspiration this gives to their different conceptions of history. We will see how the major historical divide is not, as it was for Marxism, between a communist future and a pre-communist past, but between "modern," "rational-legal," "industrial" and "disciplinary" society on the one side and "traditional," "patrimonial," "feudal," and "repressive" society on the other. The communist future is denied in different ways. The optimistic Durkheim argues that "socialism," or something like it, is almost already with us whereas the pessimistic Weber argues that "communism" can only lead to deeper bureaucratization. Foucault goes even further to dismiss conceptions of any utopian future as dangerous while feminists naturally ask what happens to male domination in this classless utopia.
Sociology: Weber Term Paper Help
Click to Order WEBER'S THEORIES OF bureaucracy. Social theorist's ideas on typesof administrations and authority. Click to Order CALVINISM sociology.
http://www.research-assistance.com/hazel-doc/ra-topics/sociology_weber.html
Sociology 530: Organizations
on closed reserve (ie, borrow and photocopy, then return) in sociology Departmentmailroom were when they were written Weber's essay on bureaucracy (from which
http://www.princeton.edu/~sociolog/grad/courses/fall1997/dimaggio_soc530af1997.h

Extractions: Sociology 520q: Selected Topics in Social Processes ORGANIZATIONS Instructor: Paul DiMaggio Time: 9:00am-12noon, Tuesday Place: 2-C-8 Green Hall Readings Objective Focus Requirements ... Week 6 Readings Readings on closed reserve (i.e., borrow and photocopy, then return) in Sociology Department mailroom. I will put two copies of each reading in the seminar box at least one week before the seminar meeting. This system only works if seminar members do not remove papers for any other reason than immediate reading or photocopying. Objective . The objective of this mini-seminar is to introduce the major themes and some of the major works in organizational studies, and thus to provide an overview for the curious and a platform from which the student who may wish to take comprehensives or teach a course in this area can pursue the topic independently. Focus Because this is a mini-seminar, the reading list is highly selective. (Lists of supplementary readings will be provided for those who wish to pursue certain themes further.) I have chosen to emphasize major contemporary issues and developments, at the cost of excluding much of the historical literature influential on the development of the field (e.g., Weber, Marx, Michels, Urwick, Fayol, Follett, Roethlisberger and Dixon, Barnard etc.). We begin with two weeks on older works and ideas that are as central to the field now as they were when they were written: Weber's essay on bureaucracy (from which all else in organization studies flows); in week 2, the work of "Carnegie School" theorists, Herbert Simon, James March, and colleagues, who emphasize the ways in which organization structures are shaped by the cognitive limitations of the people who occupy them.
Sociology 1996-97 Graduate Bulletin
sociology of work in formal organizations. From classic theories on division of labor,industrial capitalism, and bureaucracy, to transformation of work in the
http://coursecat.sdsu.edu/GB9697/SOC.html

Extractions: (Graduate Adviser) Richard L. Hough, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Kenji Ima, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Bohdan Kolody, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology David L. Preston, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Rubén G. Rumbaut, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Dennis C. Scheck, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Rolf H. K. Schulze, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Robert W. Winslow, Ph.D., Professor of Sociology Robert E. Buck, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Sociology Shelly E. Chandler, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Sociology Phillip T. Gay, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Sociology Will C. Kennedy, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Sociology

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

21-40 of 77 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 20